PENGARUH KOMPETENSI DIGITAL DAN ADAPTABILITAS TERHADAP KINERJA ORGANISASI DENGAN LEARNING AGILITY SEBAGAI VARIABEL INTERVENING PADA SEKRETARIAT DPRD KABUPATEN KUTAI TIMUR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61896/jeki.v4i3.235Keywords:
Adaptabilitas, Kompetensi Digital, Kinerja Organisasi, Learning Agility, Path AnalysisAbstract
ABSTRAK
Produktivitas organisasi publik di era digital menghadapi tantangan berupa rendahnya kompetensi digital dan keterbatasan adaptabilitas pegawai dalam merespons perubahan lingkungan kerja. Fenomena ini terlihat pada Sekretariat DPRD Kabupaten Kutai Timur, di mana transformasi digital birokrasi menuntut pegawai untuk memiliki kemampuan belajar cepat (learning agility) agar kinerja organisasi tetap optimal. Permasalahan muncul karena tidak semua pegawai memiliki kesiapan digital maupun kemampuan beradaptasi, sehingga diperlukan kajian empiris mengenai faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi kinerja organisasi dengan learning agility sebagai variabel intervening. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan analisis jalur (path analysis) berbantuan SPSS 25. Populasi penelitian berjumlah 335 pegawai, namun setelah penerapan rumus Slovin dan proses validasi data, jumlah responden yang layak dianalisis menjadi 182 orang. Gugurnya sebagian responden disebabkan oleh ketidaklengkapan pengisian kuesioner dan inkonsistensi jawaban, sehingga hanya data yang valid digunakan dalam analisis. Teknik sampling yang diterapkan adalah non-probability sampling dengan kategori proportional random sampling, sesuai karakteristik populasi yang berstrata secara proporsional. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kompetensi digital berpengaruh positif terhadap learning agility, sementara adaptabilitas tidak berpengaruh terhadap learning agility. Sebaliknya, adaptabilitas dan learning agility terbukti berpengaruh positif terhadap kinerja organisasi, sedangkan kompetensi digital tidak berpengaruh langsung terhadap kinerja organisasi. Temuan ini mengimplikasikan bahwa dalam konteks birokrasi pemerintahan, learning agility berperan sebagai mekanisme penting yang menjembatani kompetensi digital dan adaptabilitas dengan kinerja organisasi. Kontribusi penelitian ini adalah memberikan perspektif baru bahwa investasi pada pengembangan learning agility lebih strategis dibandingkan sekadar peningkatan kompetensi digital, karena learning agility terbukti menjadi faktor penentu keberhasilan adaptasi organisasi terhadap perubahan lingkungan.
ABSTRACT
Organizational productivity in the public sector during the digital era faces challenges such as limited digital competence and insufficient adaptability among employees in responding to dynamic work environments. This phenomenon is evident in the Secretariat of the Regional House of Representatives (DPRD) of Kutai Timur Regency, where digital transformation in bureaucracy requires employees to possess strong learning agility to maintain organizational performance. The problem arises because not all employees are digitally ready or adaptable, creating the need for an empirical study on the factors influencing organizational performance with learning agility as an intervening variable. This study employed a quantitative approach using path analysis supported by SPSS 25. The population consisted of 335 employees; however, after applying Slovin’s formula and validating the data, only 182 respondents were deemed eligible for analysis. The reduction in sample size was due to incomplete questionnaire responses and inconsistent answers, ensuring that only valid data were analyzed. The sampling technique used was non-probability sampling with proportional random sampling, appropriate for a population that is heterogeneous and stratified proportionally. The findings reveal that digital competence has a positive effect on learning agility, while adaptability does not significantly influence learning agility. Conversely, adaptability and learning agility positively affect organizational performance, whereas digital competence does not directly impact organizational performance. These results imply that in the context of government bureaucracy, learning agility plays a crucial role as a bridging mechanism between digital competence, adaptability, and organizational performance. The contribution of this study lies in highlighting that investment in developing learning agility is more strategic than merely enhancing digital competence, as learning agility proves to be the key determinant of organizational adaptability and performance in a changing environment
References
Badriyah, M. 2015. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Cetakan 1. CV. Pustaka. Bandung.
Bastian dalam Tangkilisan, H. N. 2005. Manajemen Publik. PT. Grasindo. Jakarta.
Darmadi. 2018. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. CV. Budi Utama. Yogyakarta.
Derue, D. S., Ashford, S. J., & Myers, C. G. 2012. Learning Agility: In Search of Conceptual Clarity and Theoretical Grounding. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(3), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754- 9434.2012.01444.
Dwiyanto, Agus. 2008. Reformasi Birokrasi Publik di Indonesia. PPSK-UGM. Yogyakarta.
Elenkov, D.S., Judge, W. and Wright, P. 2005, Strategic Leadership And Executive Innovation Influence: An International Multi-Cluster Comparative Study, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 26 No. 7, pp. 665-682.
Elisnawati et all. 2022. Pengaruh Kompetensi Digital, Beban Kerja dan Budaya Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai. Jurnal. Vol. 31. No. 1. Hal. 38-49
Gravett, L.S & Caldwell, S.A. 2016. Learning Agility. Palgrave Machmillan US. New York.
Keban, Yeremias T. 2004. Enam Dimensi Strategis Administrasi Pubik : Konsep, Teori dan Isu. Gaya Media. Yogyakarta.
Lombardo, M.M & Eichinger, R.W. 2000. High Potentials as High Learners. Human Resource Management. Vol. 39. No. 4. 321-329.
Mayes, T., & Fowler, C. 2006. Peserta didik, belajar literasi dan paedagogi e-learning. Literasi digital untuk pembelajaran. 26:33.
Muizu, W. O. Z & Budiarti L. 2017. Dampak Program Pelatihan Terhadap Kompetensi Digital Karyawan PT. Belant Persada di Bandung. Jurnal. Vol. 35. Hal. 733-740.
Patton, W & Lokan, J. 2001. Perspectives on Donald Super Construct of Career Maturity. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance.
Tornatzky, L.G & Fleischer, M. 1990. The Process of Techonological Innovation. Lexington Books. Lexington.
O’Reilly, C.A & Tushman, M.L. 2013. Organizational Ambidexterity : Past, Present and Future. Academy of Management Perspectives. 27 (4). 324-338
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Verdy Sarangnga, RR Tri Gunarti Ningrum, Nurlianti Nurlianti, Nely Nely

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



Google Scholar
Garuda
ISSN Portal
ICI Copernicus
APA 7th
Grammarly
Mendeley